I was there for the rise of #HinduLivesMatter @CNN

On Saturday , March 11th, my friends and I joined with dozens of other Hindus outside the CNN building in Columbus Circle, Manhattan, to protest the "news" network's biased and inaccurate portrayal of Hindusim in their mockumentray series "Believer" produced by Sharia Law apologist Reza Aslan. The community was outraged that not only were the Hindu sect known as Aghoris trivialized, but Hinduism was suggested to be inherently based on immutable "caste".  It was further outrageous that the predominantly white and leftist CNN engaged in their #Hinduphobia by way of an effete house Muslim, Reza Aslan, especially since Reza is known to defend Islamic States which are demonstrably theocratic tyrannies and systematically oppress minorities (read non-muslims/secularists). But why is the white left and their Muslim sidekicks singling us Hindus our for persecution?

We all know that in the west today, their is a hierarchy of race, gender and religion imposed upon us by the predominantly white left.  Depending on your skin color, you sex, your level of education and you economic income, the white left determines what level of praise or criticism you deserve, how much you should be helped and how much you should be antagonized.  Your status under white leftism is dependent upon how well you fit their narrative and how useful you are to their vague goals.  All leftism, whether concentrated or diluted or adulterated or evolved, rests upon the theories of Karl Marx and his Communist Manifesto.  While today most leftists are not true Communists, all leftists carry deep streaks of Communist thinking within their ideologies.  Thus leftists, as a large amorphous dirty blob, are no longer hurtling us toward the revolution and the worker state, but this gelatinous concoction is still ever slowly rolling societies down into the abyss with it, and white leftists are usually at the helm of this social murder-suicide. So how do Hindus fit into the white left's plans?

The white left has more or less determined for very specific reasons that #MuslimLivesMatter more than #BlackLivesMatter which matter more than #GayLivesMatter which matter more than #LatinoLivesMatter which matter more than #WomanLivesMatter which matter more than #ApostateLivesMatter and so on and so forth forever.  Now this above list may not be in the precise order as determined by the left's usefulness rubric, but I think most observant Hindus can understand and have perceived the general logic above.  Now what you need to know is that #HinduLivesMatter least of all to the white left, because Hindus are their greatest threat.  

African Americans have the misfortune of being very useful to the white left in America, and not because of any fault of their own.  Like all civilizations, African civilization has gone through cycles of social rise and decline, every race is capable of unique profound civic expression, as well as extreme and depressing civic decay.  At the time when the Christian whites (stress Christian) and Muslim arabs (stress Muslim) were pillaging Africa, taking and selling blacks as slaves, these races and civilizations were experiencing an "upswing" in organizational power, while Africa had fallen into a dark age, this is what facilitated the Christian white and Muslim arab slave trade. The blacks were then transported to many foreign nations, including America, where they were enslaved.  They were not allowed to read or become educated, and even after the end of slavery they experienced extreme forms of social and political persecution which oppressed them and ruined their opportunities to thrive.  Thus, while American blacks have removed many of their formal shackles, today the community is less educated, less wealthy, less represented in government and less mobile than the average population.  This makes #BlackLivesMatter to the left because blacks are more exploitable, more desperate, and more susceptible.  Blacks in America would have much to gain form "change", and the left preaches a form of "change" that sounds alluring, but when you get down to the bottom of it, what they are actually preaching is bureaucratic tyranny and micro-class/micro-racial warfare. Leftism is not based on building and creating, but destroying and maintaining, the evidence of this you can see in Venezuela or Sweden or anywhere else leftists have the majority of power. 

Other "minorities" are important to the left, but these have a tendency to diminish in importance and usefulness to them.  Latinos are somewhat useful to the left because they at times create cultural, economic and social conflict with the left's native white enemies.  However, because unlike America blacks, Latinos were somewhat able to incubate their own unique cultures in South America, they are often times more interested in their own culture and beliefs than overthrowing the current system. Their stronger family values make them less susceptible to social engineering, and their strong Catholic streak makes it difficult for leftists to bring them down with meaningless entertainment culture and a nihilistic lifestyle. Also, Latinos have a tendency to be more career and money and success oriented, so they are more invested in America's mainstream culture.  But the left can use racial and linguistic clashes to tug at Latinos from time to time, and thus Latinos are somewhat important to the left, but not as important as blacks. 

While there are thousands of minorities and sub-minorities which the left categorizes depending upon how useful they are to the left's cause, the last I will discuss here are the LGBTQ community.  #GayLivesMatter perhaps a little less than #LatinoLivesMatter, because the LGBTQ community is even more complex and nuanced than Latinos when it comes to how they can be maneuvered by the secular white priests of leftism. The LGBTQ community is multi-racial, and is often times divided within itself according to lines of class, education and ethnicity. The only reason gays are important to the white left is because since they have been persecuted by white Christians, they have some animosity  toward the current system and some of its Christian undercurrents.  However, gays also have a strong tradition of being involved in the Churches and even Mosques, so many of the left's religious critics are themselves gay, and even if they are closeted everyone knows they are gay anyway.  Gays also tend to be attracted to higher educated and higher paying jobs, so they do have a tendency to be more represented in the administrative and power classes of American society, you will find a disproportionate number of gay men at the top of the corporate and political world.  However, because the Church is constantly demonizing gays, the left has an in on the community and they know how to use it.  They can twist natural social justice movements, such as the need for respect for transgenders, and turn these into ugly vices, such as forcefully ramming transgender issues into societies in specific ways which will cause conflict, the left's lack of tact on these issues are deliberate. 

Of all the above minorities, you will never find the left creating documentaries which bring their cultures or behaviors into question, the white left would never demonize black or African communities, they would never question Latino culture or South American civilization, and they would not analyze any of the more destructive behaviors founds in the LGBTQ community today (reaction to oppression/isolation). But above all else, they would never criticize Islamic States or the theocratic legal system of Sharia Law which kills gays, enslaves blacks and oppresses women.  Now when I say never, I mean never in any significant way, the left will never significantly disparage anything black, gay, latino or above all else Muslim, however they routinely degrade, mock, insult and misrepresent Hinduism, but again the question is, why? 

When the white leftists at CNN sent their Muslim pet Reza Aslan to India to film the Aghoris, they knew exactly what they were doing, and they knew that the finished product was defamatory and inaccurate.  The white left is educated and experienced, they don't make these kinds of mistakes innocently.  CNN chose to focus on a small minority sect which most Hindus have probably never heard of or even understand.  The Aghori are a minority Shiva sect who focus on Hinduism's principle of non-duality as it applies to social and physical "purity".  While most Hindus would naturally follow common social and sanitary practices, the Aghori buck these conventions and go to the other extremes; the Aghori are known for engaging in shocking behavior such as eating the flesh of dead bodies and consuming defecation.  While most Hindus would find this to be outrageous, it is tolerated because it is true that god's veda (univeral knowledge) can be found in every place.  The Aghori are the Hindu version of the left's completely degenerate artist.  While most white leftists find it strange when their "feminists" paint pictures with their menstrual blood naked on the streets, they all intuitively understand that these bizarre women may have some abstract or esoteric point or knowledge which they need to understand and learn from, even if it is for them to learn not to behave like her! While white leftists allow all forms of debauchery in their art, including hardcore pornography which actually damages the bodies of the participants, when Hindus allow for sects who are looking for conceptual knowledge in a pile of shit, this becomes the subject of their farcical reporting tempered with hate. 

So why has the white left targeted Hindus and Hinduism?  The white left wants everyone to believe that it and it alone has the corner on diversity and liberal culture, but we Hindus are a threat to that monopoly.  We have millions of sects and schools and ways of life which allow the individual to find their unique path in our society, even if that means they become and atheist or an outrage.  But what the left hates most of all is that Hindus, who suffered just as much colonialism as any other "brown" people, and who also suffer racism in the USA and abroad, Hindus had the cultural, social and philosophical background to rise above these hardships to become more educated and more wealthy than the white left themselves.  The white left does not want educated, hardworking brown people with deep culture, this gets in the way or their narrative that all browns are naturally oppressed and that only the white left establishment can save them.  But there is something far more sinister at work here, and it comes from the left's inherent fear of Hinduism, it is the core of their Hinduphobia.  The while lefts uses diversity and pluralism and liberalism to destroy civilization, their whole ideology is based upon removing the old order but at the same time being so entitled as to believe that the old order should fall right into their hands so that they can cynically maintain what has already been made, they think they don't need to create any new society themselves.  

Hinduism is the direct opposite of leftism, because we use diversity and pluralism and liberalism to build civilization and improve civilization.  The white leftist spreads degeneracy so that those who fall into it find nihilism and then contemptuously demand what their enemies have produced. The Hindu allows for the rise of contrarian sects, which break all social customs, so that conventional thinking does not become cemented into society; the youth who become Aghoris, if they return, should have gained universal knowledge which could never have been retrieved in the college classroom or temple or boardroom.  Hinduism channels social discontent not into nihilistic abasement but into unconventional philosophy which is nevertheless still synonymous with the whole of Hindu society.  The white left's prophets are the enemies of the social order, the Hindu prophet is integrated into the social order.  The white left sees this strength in Hinduism and knows it is a threat to their hegemony, they know that Hinduism is an antidote to their death spiral.  This is why they hate Hinduism and Hindus so much and will now expand that last of their tired old energy waging a war against the Eternal Religion, and they will lose.