Matriarchy vs Patriarchy and the Survival of the Vedas

I love being sparked to write after engaging in a conversation with others, inspiration which comes from the thoughts and questions of other minds helps keep my writing to be grounded in topics of immediate reality.  I was moved to write today after reading and speaking to the writer on a piece entitled "Marxist Derogation of Terminology and its Remedy".  The article more or less puts the blame of modern day forms of Leftist Feminism on Marxist thinkers, which is true; however the article also questions the legitimacy of matriarchal societies, implying they maybe inherently socialistic-democratic, orgiastic, and do not see the value in benevolent war or violence. This in comparison to patriarchies which are inherently property based, disciplined and which understand the need for holy warfare. 

The writer's theory further asserts that the feminine ideal breaks down what are known as the "six concentric sets: the individual, family, tribe, ethnos, race, and species" in favor of only the collective humanism and the individual's role in that humanism. According to the writer, the only way to remedy this situation is to return to a more "naturalistic", "biocentric" and "spiritual" outlook which elevates such terms as ethnicity, tribe and family above mass humanism and the individual, and this is only accomplished by establishing the ancient system of Vedic monarchy and patriarchy. This is put in the context of preserving the white race, which is in steep decline , and yes, without a Vedic remedy will soon evaporate from the face of the earth.

I further posit that we must try our best to avoid the terms ‘left’ and ‘right’, which are manmade concepts rooted in the French Revolution, and revive a kind of naturalistic, biocentric, spiritual outlook which elevates white racial consciousness, that seeks to thwart the attacks of these subverters onto mankind at large. This must be done in order that balance can be restored to the understanding of human taxonomy as opposed to its complete deconstruction. As alluring as it may seem, we must overcome ideas such as National Socialism, and play the ‘long-game’ of strategic infiltration ourselves.  I believe that a divine Vedic monarchy and a hierarchical caste system could solve the existential challenge that faces our race today. ‘Vedic’ comes from ‘veda’, which means ‘to know’ or ‘to be aware of’, which in turn comes from the blood and spirit of our people. I think that the Brahmin priest caste and Kshatriya warrior caste should rule and alternate together just as our Aryan ancestors would do.

 Because the article mentioned "Vedas" as the solution, I took some time to discuss the article with the writer.  The writer asserts that when he says "Vedic" he is implying the cousin (or can we say sibling) Vedic knowledge which existed among the Europeans, and most specifically the Slavs during the white race's pagan era.  The main topic of conversation was not a disagreement on the corrosive, anti-male, anti-social and inherently Marxist forms of Leftist "Feminism" we are experiencing today, but the question of whether or not ancient matriarchy (if it truly existed) were not "biocentric", "naturalistic" and "spiritual".  Since both I and the writer have at least some understanding of Vedic history as it pertains to the now Indian written Vedas, here is where our analysis began.

We all know that many of the Vedic hymns were written by female sages, however the Samhita Vedas, the oldest layer of the Vedas, most definitely describe a patriarchal warrior society based upon the expansion of territory, the acquisition of property and the defeat of enemies.  While women are not unduly denigrate in the Vedas, they are (USUALLY) depicted in a more traditional feminine role of being passive counterparts to their husbands. It was under the more warlike masculine auspices that the Vedas themselves seemed to have been written.  But the question arises, where are the patriarchal Aryans and their Vedic religion today?

It is generally accepted that modern day "Hinduism" is simply and evolution of the old Vedic religion, enhanced by centuries of interaction with the tribalism it met as it expanded into further territories.  While strong female goddess exist throughout the Vedas, the rulers of the pantheons were masculine and were the central focus of worship.  It was not until later that the female centric goddess of Shaktism such as Kali and Durga began to appear.  these were likely once gynocentric tribal goddess who rather than being replaced by the Vedas, absorbed the Vedas and came to protect them as their very own. Now these tribal goddess were anything but passive but were fierce defenders of their devotees and who struck fear in even the British colonial invaders who were known for their fascistic sadism. It is obvious that these goddesses maintained a ferocious territory protecting warrior ethic prior to their induction into the Vedic pantheon.

Kali, Tara, Tripura Sundari, Bhuvaneshvari, Bhairavi,
Chhinnamasta, Dhumavati, Bagalamukhi, Matangi & Kamala . Consort - Shiva.

As we know, the Aryan male warrior cult of Vedism faded and disappeared as the Vedic people's settled down and began to further absorb tribal culture.  It would seem that when war was less necessary, when softer times arrived, that this patriarchy just could not stand the test of time.  Today, the Vedas are not upheld by masculine warrior cults of military sky gods such as Indra, who is hardly worshiped at all, but by the much more androgynous gods like Krishna and Kali. It is simply obvious that in modern times the ancient Vedas survive and continue to breath due to strong feminine influence on the religion.  However, it is also obvious that this is no stereotypical matriarchy as the female gods which now safeguard the Vedas, unlike their masculine counterparts, contain many masculine traits such as being masters of weaponry and dealers in death.

The conversation with the writer went on to discuss the masculine creative power vs the feminine preservative power.  Yes, it would seem that our Vedas could only have been written under a war time patriarchy, but it would also seem that they could only have been preserved by a peace time matriarchy. The female is more supple and bending, she is willing and able to absorb foreign knowledge and use this to protect the pure, she is obsessed with finding clever and meandering ways of surviving, where as the masculine would rather die on his shield than see his work "corrupted".   The masculine sky Vedas have only survived because they have been enveloped in feminine tribal earth, and without this mothering nurture we would have likely lost the Vedas forever, just as Europe lost his Vedas.

This was the final end of my discussion with the writer, that the European Vedas did not survive in tact because Europe (particularly the Slavs) did not have matriarchal tribals to induct and preserve this wisdom under feminine power.  Indeed, we know the opposite happened, as it attested by the rampant "witch burnings" which took place throughout Europe, the wiping out of the vestiges of the ancient pagan religion which was maintained by individual women, this done by men who had in military fashion accepted the hyper-masculine, belligerent monotheistic god of the sky. My point to the writer is this, yes we do indeed need a return to Vedic monarchy and perhaps even patriarchy, particularly in the west where the need is most dire, however we must also create an institutionalized system of matriarchy which is given reign over protecting the Vedas in a more wet, accepting, accommodating and sisterly way, for it is matriarchy which has proven it is able to wield both sides of the spectrum, masculine and feminine, while the masculine has not yet reached this zenith and has proven unworthy for the longer term survival of the masculine Vedas which he created.